And the news media keeps playing up the spread of the
virus to Texas, and the possibility of a spead across the USA.... that would be
the bad news,... but potentially good news is this: Way back in 2008 the
federal government itself demonstrated the fact that antimicrobial silver is,
under certain conditions extremely effective against Ebola and other
hemorrhagic fever viruses.
How soon we forget how shrewdly the federal government used
the overblown anthrax scare directly after 9-11 to rob us of many of our
precious Constitutional rights. We also forget how the news media later whipped
up the so-called “Bird flu” hysteria, followed by the “Swine flu” hysteria.
Through these manufactured crises, various departments of the federal government
were able to pass new “guidelines” and regulations on the detention and
quarantine of U.S. citizens.... These can now be used by the federal
government to restrict travel at a moment’s notice, arrest and detain
individuals, and even quarantine entire cities during a declared “national
That’s why I agree with Steve Barwick and am extremely
skeptical of the current so-called “Ebola crisis.” And yes, I understand how
virulent and deadly Ebola and other hemorrhagic fever viruses are. I also
understand that the federal government is now said to be bringing Ebola victims
to the U.S. for treatment. And I understand what a threat that could pose
should the virus ultimately get loose and go rogue in this country. But we
really need to see the larger picture...
Understand how psychological operations (psy-ops) campaigns
work, and what the federal government stands to gain from them. The federal
government absolutely loves it whenever they can whip up enough public hysteria
that the resulting public outcry to “protect us” allows them to step in as
“saviors” and implement more laws that violate our fundamental rights and
liberties under the guise of “keeping us safe.” Not to mention the fact that
the US owns the current patent on a possible Ebola virus pharmaceutical cure...
So folks, this current “Ebola crisis” is indeed a massive psy-ops
campaign. In other words, the threat is largely being manufactured and planted
into the minds of the American public, through the federal government/news media
It is important not to get into fear about the things we
see going on around us and understand the difference between Real v/s
That doesn’t mean the danger from Ebola isn’t
real. Quite the contrary. It’s very real, if you’re exposed to it. But what’s
your actual likelihood of exposure? It’s virtually nil. Which means
while the threat may be “real,” it’s not very realistic.
Let me explain with an example you can probably relate to:
The deadly, drug-resistant super-pathogen MRSA is also very real. In
fact, it’s just as “real” as Ebola. But the difference between MRSA and Ebola is
that MRSA is a far more realistic threat to the population of the U.S.
than Ebola. We know that, because the FDA’s own testing has demonstrated that
61% of all meat in supermarkets is already contaminated with the deadly
MRSA pathogen (up
from 50% only last year). And independent testing backs those numbers up.
Largely because of this, some 39,000 Americans now get infected by the
flesh-eating MRSA pathogen every single year, and a full 20% of those
infected end up dying – constituting more deaths annually than those caused by
Now that’s a news story, right? After all, you
have a proven, deadly, antibiotic-resistant super-pathogen like MRSA
contaminating 61% of all meats in supermarkets. And you buy that meat on a
regular basis and bring it home to your family. Wouldn’t you want to know about
that? Yet there’s not so much as a peep about it in the mainstream news
media. Listen carefully. The only sound you’ll hear on this issue is
On the other hand you have a virus like Ebola, which is
largely endemic to West Africa, and which hasn’t caused a single death
anywhere in the United States…ever. Nor has there been a single
infection in the U.S. Yet the mainstream news media drumbeat about the so-called
“Ebola threat” is absolutely relentless. And as a result, people are quite
literally going out of their minds with fear over it. If you listen
carefully, you can almost hear the mainstream news media and the
end-of-the-world internet fear-mongers chanting, Ebo-la…Ebo-la…Ebo-la…Ebo-la…as
if they’re actually cheering it on.
Why the dichotomy? Why is there zero
fear-mongering over the deadly MRSA super-pathogen, even though it represents an
immediate, dire, realistic and already-proven threat to the American
populace……while in direct contrast, there’s incessant fear-mongering
over the Ebola virus, which has not so much as even been detected in this
country?And Now for the Other Side of the Story
Here’s the reality.. follow the money:
Dealing with the very real threat of MRSA would cost
Big Agriculture billions of dollars a year in sales. So if the USDA and
the FDA publicly acknowledged the growing MRSA crisis, people would stop buying
meat out of fear, and foreign markets for our beef, chicken, turkey, lamb, pork
and other meat products would also dry up overnight. The entire U.S.
agriculture industry would crumble. Billions of dollars would be lost. So
while community-acquired MRSA infections are now absolutely skyrocketing, we
don’t hear so much as a squawk about it from the news media. Nothing. Zip.
Zilch. Nada. Pitch black silence.
There are no talking heads from the FDA, CDC, WHO, or
other alphabet soup health agencies making appearances on national TV news to
warn the populace about the growing spread of MRSA.
This is spite of the fact that, for example, some
30,000-plus hospitalizations of children for this deadly disease have
taken place over the past few years alone here in the U.S. (which is double
the annual rate of child MRSA infections since the year 2000).
Why is there no outcry from the health authorities?
It’s because the health and regulatory authorities have
weighed the astonishing number of annual deaths being caused each year in this
nation by MRSA, against the economic havoc that would be caused to the
agriculture industry if they went public with this information each night on the
national news. And the regulators say, “This is an acceptable loss of life.
Let’s keep quiet about it. We’ll save as many MRSA victims as we can. And
those who die, die. We can’t risk destroying one of our nation’s largest
industries over this.”
But hyperventilating over Ebola, on the other hand,
poses no serious direct economic risk to anyone. The feds and their news media
lackeys can rile the population up, scare the living bejabbers out of them, and
convince everybody they’re our saviors if we’ll just let them “protect us” from
the threat, which of course, is largely non-existent.
The Real Question: What Will Obama Do? How far is the
federal government willing to go with this charade?
Would they, for example, allow a few controlled Ebola
infections to take place in the U.S., as a means of convincing the population
that the so-called “Ebola threat” is “real” so new restrictions to our freedoms
and new laws for detaining people could be implemented?
So with the vast majority of Americans now convinced of a
coming medical apocalypse, what next? What exactly do the powers-that-be
have in mind with the latest threat-du-jour known as Ebola? I find it
quite telling that Obama has already used the so-called Ebola crisis to
sign a new amendment to an executive order that would allow him to mandate the
apprehension and detention of Americans who merely show signs of ‘respiratory
According to an
article on InfoWars.com:
“Obama’s amendment allows for the detention of Americans
who display, ‘Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are
associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory
illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either
are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are
highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly
The InfoWars.com article goes on to explain exactly how
ominous this new executive order amendment is:
“Although Ebola was listed on the original executive
order signed by Bush, Obama’s amendment ensures that Americans who merely show
signs of respiratory illness, with the exception of influenza, can be forcibly
detained by medical authorities.
Although the quarantining of
people suspected of being infected with the Ebola virus seems like a perfectly
logical move, the actual preconditions for this to happen aren’t restricted to
just those suffering from the disease.
As we highlighted earlier
this week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has measures in
place for dealing with an outbreak of a communicable disease which allow for the
quarantine of “well persons” who “do not show symptoms” of the disease.
In addition, under the
Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, public health authorities and governors
would be given expanded police powers to seize control of communications
devices, public and private property, as well as a host of other draconian
measures in the event of a public health emergency.
When the legislation was
introduced, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons warned that it
‘could turn governors into dictators’.”
At this point, the so-called “Ebola crisis” is a
fabricated one. And the sooner we realize it, the lower the chances are that
the federal government can take further advantage of it by reducing our freedoms
under the guise of “saving” us.?
You’d have far more reason to be concerned of a
deadly MRSA superbug infection striking your household than you would an Ebola
infection. You can come into contact with the MRSA superbug just about any day
of the week – right now -- especially when you shop for meat at your
local supermarket. What’s more, with MRSA all you need is a small cut or
scratch on your body for it to go internal, induce sepsis, cause organ failure
and other calamities, giving you a one-in-five chance of living through the
(But thankfully, colloidal silver cures MRSA with relative
ease. See the clinical and anecdotal evidence presented on the
Colloidal Silver Cures MRSA website, and in Steve Barwicks article “Does
Colloidal Silver Really Cure MRSA?”)
So your likelihood of coming into contact with the deadly
MRSA pathogen is quite high. But your likelihood of being anywhere near the
vicinity of an Ebola victim is just about zero.
So please think about it. Ebola may be a “real” threat,
but it’s not a very realistic threat here in the U.S. At least, not
yet. The true threat at this point is the federal government and the new
regulations being implemented to give the federal government the power to detain
anybody they want, at any time, under the guise of a “national health crisis.”
Here's some good news on Colloidal Silver and Ebola:
What We Know So Far... Which, finally, brings us to the
topic of colloidal silver and Ebola.
Back in 2008, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) in
conjunction with several other federal agencies quietly conducted clinical
research into the use of silver nanoparticles against Ebola and other
hemorrhagic fever viruses. And what they found was astonishing. They
discovered that silver nanoparticles were highly effective against these deadly
viruses, including the Ebola virus.
They later presented their findings to federal health
regulators and other national health authorities. But it was all kept top
secret. The presentation was called “Silver Nanoparticles Neutralize
Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses.”
And the gist of the presentation was that silver
nanoparticles displayed “powerful neutralizing effects against hemorrhagic fever
viruses,” including Arenavirus and Filovirus (i.e., Ebola). This clinical
presentation was conducted under the auspices of the DOD’s Defense Threat
Reduction Agency (DTRA) and the U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Center for
Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction. And the presentation was given by
researchers from the Applied Biotechnology Branch, 711th Human Performance Wing
of the Air Force Research Laboratory. In other words, those are the big guns,
folks! Which is to say, those are the very people responsible for keeping this
nation safe from outside threats like bioterrorism.
That clinical presentation, made to federal regulators and
national health authorities, was later summarized in a printed document,
de-classified, and cleared for public release. But there was no news media
hoopla surrounding the release of this information. Not a peep.
And to this very day, to my knowledge, there still hasn’t
been a single report in the mainstream news media on the release of this
important information, in spite of the fact that Department of Defense
researchers found antimicrobial silver to be profoundly effective against Ebola
and other hemorrhagic fever viruses, under certain circumstances.
Before we get into the results of this research, as
documented in the published version of the DOD presentation, it’s important to
note that one of the main tasks of the DOD’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency is
to “anticipate and mitigate future threats long before they have a chance to
harm the United States and our allies.” In other words, the researchers were
specifically looking for ways to stop Ebola or other hemorrhagic fever viruses
from damaging our national security. And the results they found when using
silver nanoparticles for that precise purpose were strikingly positive -- enough
so to warrant not just the presentation to health and regulatory authorities,
but its later publication and public release.
What Researchers Discovered
The researchers tested silver nanoparticles of several
different sizes and concentrations on infected cells in vitro (meaning,
in the test tube). And they concluded that silver nanoparticles were able to
neutralize hemorrhagic fever viruses inside the cells by “decreasing S segment
gene expression and concomitantly decreasing progeny virus production.”
Translation: Silver stops the Ebola
virus and related hemorrhagic fever viruses from replicating inside the cells.
And when there’s no viral replication inside the cells, there’s no spread of
The researchers had discovered the holy grail Ebola
treatments. But they also discovered that neutralization of the virus by silver
occurs during the early phases of viral replication. Therefore, they
pointed out that for antimicrobial silver to be effective against Ebola and
other hemorrhagic fever viruses, the treatment would have
to be administered PRIOR to viral infection or at least within the first few
hours after initial exposure to the virus.
In other words, for antimicrobial silver to be
effective, an exposed person would need to have already been taking it,
or at the very least would have to start taking it within a few short hours of
exposure to an infected individual. This is why HCL recommends taking
Colloidal silver on a daily basis and many users are on the
saving money while charging thier immune...
Another interesting thing the researchers discovered
is that while an enzymatic protein called Cathepsin B has been shown to play an
essential role in Ebola virus replication, silver nanoparticles work to decrease
cathepsin activity, thus further limiting viral replication in the cell and
subsequent spread of the virus to other cells. And by far the most interesting
thing the researchers discovered (at least, to me) is that only very low
concentrations of silver nanoparticles were necessary to prevent replication of
the virus. This means that low concentrations of 10 ppm nanosilver appears to
have worked better than higher concentrations of 25 ppm or 50 ppm nanosilver.
This means there’s no need for overly high silver concentrations. Do not let CS
makers and resellers try to tell you that because it is a higher pPM that it is
better... this is nonsense and simply the opposite from truth.
on this here) What’s more, the
smallest silver particles tested by the researchers worked far better than the
larger silver particles tested. This
demonstrates once more that the use of very small silver particles is far
more important than the “ppm” or concentration of the colloidal silver solution
one is using.
Simply put, smaller silver particles penetrate cells and
tissues easier, and are therefore better able to get to the point of infection
before the virus spreads.
a link to the printed version of the DOD clinical presentation, so you can
scroll through it and read it for yourself. It’s technical. But if you take
your time it’s relatively understandable.
I cannot tell you what to do, or that this product cures
anyting only becasue the FDA forbids me to, but read through and make your own
decisions. Here’s What I’d Do in Case of Ebola
People have written to ask me, “how much colloidal silver
would you have to take in order to protect yourself from an Ebola infection?”
And of course, the answer is, no one knows for sure. As I mentioned, the DOD
research discussed above was in vitro (i.e., laboratory test tube)
research. And while it demonstrated that very small particles of silver at
surprisingly low concentrations could stop the Ebola virus in infected cells
from replicating and spreading, it in no way gives us so much as a clue as to
how much colloidal silver a living human being would have to take in
order to achieve the same results.
So being the person that I am, and one that refuses to get
into fear over a thing because i trust more in God than anything or anyone else,
I take 3 teaspoons a day. Indeed, it appears that to have the very best
chance of protection, utilizing colloidal silver in small amounts on a daily
basis would be the way to go.
In other words, based on the DOD study, daily prophylactic
dosing with colloidal silver before exposure to the Ebola virus would
appear to provide better protection than dosing after exposure.
But again, since there’s been no in vivo testing
that we know of (i.e., no testing of colloidal silver usage in a real-life human
being infected with Ebola, only in test tubes) there’s simply no way to know for
an absolute certainty if regular oral use of colloidal silver would provide an
adequate amount of protection upon exposure to the Ebola virus.
Nebulizing Colloidal Silver
Some people have pointed out that in the event of exposure
to the Ebola virus, immediately nebulizing with colloidal silver (i.e., inhaling
an atomized mist of colloidal silver into the lungs, using a device called a
medical nebulizer) would be a potentially effective way to get colloidal silver
into the bloodstream, cells and tissues of the human body quickly and
effectively. And that’s a very good possibility. Why? Because just
about anything inhaled into the lungs has a far better chance of making it into
the bloodstream, cells and tissues of the body faster than oral ingestion.
Indeed, were I to suspect that I’d just been exposed to a person infected with
Ebola, probably the first thing I’d do would be to high-tail it back
home, break out my medical nebulizer, fill the little basin with very small
particle size colloidal silver of 10 ppm concentration, turn the machine on and
inhale the colloidal silver mist into my lungs for five or six minutes. And I’d
probably repeat the process every few hours for up to five or six times after
praying, of course!
Now all of that is pure layman’s speculation on my part in
terms of what might work. I'm just talking off the top of my head. I'm no
doctor. And I'm not "prescribing" for anyone else, of course. After all,
nobody’s ever had to do this before. So use of oral doses of colloidal
silver for Ebola is an unknown factor in terms of knowing how much to use, how
to use it effectively, and when to use it.
But based on the DOD research, it would seem to me that
the key would be quick action utilizing 10 ppm colloidal silver with a very
small particle size, and getting it into the cells and tissues of the body as
quickly as possible. Even more preferable, the research suggests, would be
to take a small amount of colloidal silver prophylactically (i.e., before the
fact), on a daily basis, so it’s already in the body in the event of exposure to
One More Interesting Thought... Someone (nameless for
privacy reasons) said that if he were in an area where Ebola virus outbreaks
were taking place, one thing he’d do is wear a protective face mask any time he
had to go out into the public, such as to the supermarket or
mall. HealthyChristianLiving.com is coming out with a new
Colloidal Silver mask specifically for reasons as this.. And he said
he’d also lightly spray his hands and face with colloidal silver (Germ-B-Gone)
at the same time, and allow it to air dry, as well. He farther explained “I'm
asthmatic, and I've done this before as a precautionary measure when going out
into the public during flu outbreaks, for example. I may look a bit strange but
I seldom ever get the flu.”
Obviously, he is a forward thinker. And it’s probably not
a bad idea to take such precautions should you ever feel the situation ever
truly warrant it.
To sum up, at this point in time (August 2014) in the
United States the so-called “Ebola crisis” is the modern-day equivalent of
Shakespeare’s “Much ado about nothing.” While Ebola is a very real danger
should one become exposed to the disease, the threat of exposure is not yet very
realistic. In fact, the threat is pretty much nil here in the
U.S. where all of the unnecessary panic is nevertheless taking place. The only
thing this manufactured panic will serve at this point is the very real threat
of the federal government stepping in and using the panic to institute even
greater restrictions on our fundamental freedoms and liberties. This is the
information on hand as of October 4, 2014.. who knows what will be next month,
As Obama’s old mentor Rahm Emanuel so famously stated,
“Never let a good crisis go to waste.” The federal government is certainly
following that advice. Compared to the very realistic threat of acquiring
a superbug infection such as MRSA, the threat of Ebola pales in comparison.
Nevertheless, should Ebola ever become an actual threat in
this country the DOD report described above gives us some very good hope that
colloidal silver could be a bona-fide first-line of defense if used quickly
enough at 10 ppm concentration, and in very small particle size.
Yours for the safe, sane and responsible use of